America is being destroyed by those from outside of our borders and, more importantly, from within our own government. And without our government’s approval of the Mexican invasion, immigration would not be a problem. In this article I will link the two programs initiated by George W. Bush and passed on to Barack Obama, programs that will end the United States as a sovereign nation. And with an overwhelming influx of hostile immigrants with dreams of land recaptured, the United States will no longer exist as a continuous geographical area.
In America you can see the crowds, many of them illegal aliens, on the street but held back by police barricades while they hold signs that read, White Racists You Get Off Our Continent or White Racists Go Back To Europe. These illegals, mostly Mexicans, are telling Americans that we have to go back to Europe. They’re literally taking over our country, street by street and town by town. And the police do nothing to round up the illegal thugs glaring at them and white Americans, who are just trying to live normal lives, wondering when this strange madness will be over.
This mission, the reconquista, has been going on for decades and it has been growing, unchecked by authorities, to a point where the overwhelming majority of Mexicans, including Mexican/American citizens, can now feel free to support the idea of retaking, at least, the Southwestern part of the United States and de facto, making it a part of Mexico. (Open borders, control of government at all levels, dual citizenship, Spanish spoken here.)
In America you can see illegal aliens brutally attacking Americans, mostly senior citizens protesting the illegal alien invasion from Mexico. And no one is arrested. Most Americans don’t understand that our leaders have given their blessing to the invaders. Cheap labor makes us more competitive, don’t you know. Collateral damage is to be expected.
I have mentioned this a number of times but it’s hard for people to comprehend that American corporations would turn their backs on their fellow Americans for profit. Once again, they have no loyalty to any nation or its citizens, only to their bottom line. Companies have left America and opened factories in cheap labor countries, only to leave for even cheaper labor elsewhere. This is the way it was planned. They couldn’t have done this without help from Congress and each administration.
To lower American wages Bush sought to change the demographics of the United States. During a campaign speech before a Hispanic group in South Florida, he sang the praises of the Latinos living in America, including the fact that in many places in our nation the only language heard on the street is Spanish:
“For years our nation has debated this change – some have praised it and others have resented it. By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome this new America.” (A Latino America.) G.W. Bush, Miami, 2000.
Once in office, George Bush began the plan to finish his father’s Enterprise for the Americas Initiative. Under Bush, the name, now changed to the Free Trade Area of the Americas, failed to get support from a number of South American nations. This initiative would have integrated the Western Hemisphere into a trading region along the lines of the European Union. So he decided to scale back on the plan temporarily.
Bush began the process on March 23, 2005 when he and the leaders of Canada and Mexico met in Waco, Texas and agreed to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, (SPP), a security and economic community of North America.
The road map for this integrated continent with open borders is called the plan for Building a North American Community, with annual summit meetings by the three leaders of North America. Advice is from an advisory council, made up of 10 CEOs from each nation. Wal-Mart was a charter member of this organization, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC). It’s fate is unknown under the Obama administration but it probably continues advising, away from public scrutiny. And it is supposed to be a permanent institution. The NACC had responsiblity for meeting with the leaders and cabinet members of the three nations with the plans for being competitive (forming a North American Community).
A State Department article on Condoleezza Rice’s watch, describing and praising this North American Community, has a link to the plan for Building a North American Community which includes a new border (a common security perimeter) for the U.S., Canada and Mexico, open internal borders and the right of citizens of North America to “live and work” anywhere on the continent.
Go to this site above and you will find the “common security perimeter” linked from the U.S. Department of State article to the CFR plan for Building a North American Community page 8. Finally, the “perimeter” is in the latest amnesty bill, H.R. 4321. This perimeter can also be found in the other immigration amnesty bills from 2005.
This is about changing America’s border through stealth, without the consent of the American people. It can’t be accomplished without legislation from Congress. The legislation is there. Ask your member of congress if they support it, knowing that the purpose is to open our mutual internal borders to the free flow of people and commerce throughout the continent.
Obama agreed to take over the Bush plan for North American integration shortly after the election and he attended the annual summit in Guadalajara, Mexico on August 10, 2009. Secretary of State Clinton met with her counterparts in Washington on July 16, 2009 to prepare for the agenda. In her speech she said:
“This is an example of what I was speaking about yesterday in my speech, the kind of PARTNERSHIP that the United States is committed to not only building, but in this case, really DEEPENING and BROADENING. The partnership between our nations and our entire North American region has such enormous potential…And we are focused upon our shared assets and values…to make North America the most prosperous, safest, and competitive region in the world.”
Foreign Minister Espinosa of Mexico:
“We agreed on the importance of continuing to push forward in our region with mechanisms for cooperation that respond to a very clear mandate from our leaders. We should make use of our positive experience in trilateral cooperation. We should have a more strategic approach, a DEEPER approach, and also an approach that allows us to truly have results for families in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico so that they may benefit from our relationship.”
“We have worked in this joint fashion in order to CONSOLIDATE* the region as a space for trade and economic exchange that is of benefit to all.”
*Consolidate 1. To unite into one system or whole. 2. To join in a merger or union. This consolidated region is a one way street.
Deep integration, or consolidation, is the process that has taken place in all three nations with working groups at the U.S. Department of Commerce, harmonizing and integrating everything from manufacturing processes to, as George Bush said at a summit meeting in Canada, the number of jelly beans we put in a bag. It was his effort to divert a reporter’s question about an integrated North America, as in the European Union.
To get that union, everything has to be harmonized, from the smallest detail to laws that govern the region. And all regions must harmonize their laws, based on international law. The European Union, by the way, has no first amendment. They have freedom of expression, but with exceptions. If you violate these exceptions of speech, you can be sentenced to three years in prison. And there is no second amendment, the right to bear arms. There will be no second amendment in a North American Community. Obama and his attorney general are intent on working toward that end. And so will his successor.
In September of 2008, George Bush met with leaders from 11 nations of the Western Hemisphere in New York and agreed to the Pathways to Prosperity in the Americas Initiative (PPA). This is another try at integrating the Western Hemisphere into a larger trading region to compete with the European Union and replace the failed effort to complete the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas). Obama and Hillary Clinton have embraced both the North American Community and the PPA. Clinton, in an Op-Ed for the Miami Herald:
“I have also joined ministers from more than a dozen countries in the Western Hemisphere to make good on the President’s and my committment to re-launch (George Bush’s) Pathways to Prosperity, a multilateral initiative to promote shared prosperity throughout the Americas.” (Just like the North American Community).
And like the FTAA, the PPA, with 34 member nations, would be run by a trade agreement. Any laws, regulations, etc. of the member nations’ governments at any level; local, state and federal, that are in conflict with the rules of the trade agreement, must defer to the trade agreement. That includes the United States. As in NAFTA, trade tribunals or other institutions would be the highest authority in the (PPA) Western Hemisphere. These appointed institutions would cover a wide area dealing with trade disputes.
In order to make it clear where the Pathways to Prosperity is heading under Obama and Clinton, read this article by Democrat Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services under Bill Clinton and Chuck Cobb, former Undersecretary of Commerce for Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
“Some will criticize Pathways to Prosperity in the Americas since they believe it is too modest in its objectives because it might be abandoning the broader version of a 34 country FTAA. In our judgement Western Hemisphere integration must start somewhere, and this is a good start. Remember, the European Union also started small. We hope that Brazil, Uraguay, the Caribbean countries and other countries in the Americas will soon join Pathways to Prosperity in the Americas.”
The article suggests that Miami should be the headquarters of this merger of the Western Hemisphere since it is an international city. And Spanish is the language spoken in Miami.
Heidi Bronke, U.S. State Department spokeswoman said of the initiative in the Miami Herald September 26, 2008:
“Eleven leaders in this hemisphere met with our president and stood with him in a project aimed at expanding economic integration…This is not just free trade, it’s a political vision for the hemisphere.”
This process of regional integration is part of the effort by the world’s ruling elites to bring about global governance, based on international law. The next addition to the North American Community and Western Hemisphere, which will likely be called “The Americas”, will be an integration with the European Union and the African Union, which already has an agreement with the EU.
Hillary Clinton began work on global governance soon after assuming office. Her adviser, Anne-Marie Slaughter, author of A New World Order, published in 2004, is in charge of policies which will bring us to this regional and global governance. That means the end of American sovereignty and because of our special situation (the Mexican problem), the end of our nation geographically. And it won’t be peaceful.
The name for this transformation to a global system of governance is called a New World Order. Despite the critics who say there is no such thing, world leaders certainly use the term a lot; including George H.W. Bush and Henry Kissinger.
Strobe Talbott, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State under Bill Clinton:
“Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority…national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
“a system of world order – preferably a system of world government – is mandatory…The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty…” Walter Cronkite, A Reporter’s Life.
June 27, 1991, George H.W. Bush, on integrating the Western Hemisphere:
“If we can build a hemisphere devoted to freedom, one that prefers enterprise (corporate run region) to envy, we’re going to create our own new world order.”
Jan. 9, 1992, George H.W. Bush, Tokyo:
“Tonight, we celebrate the essence of this new world order and the opportunity to be true partners in its construction.”
“In this changing world where the walls that once divided whole nations from each other are crumbling, we all must become both bridges to and partners in a new world order.”
America is alone and under siege. Those who look forward to its demise are everywhere.
So who are some of those bringing an end to America’s existence? That would be the globalists, Democrats and Republicans, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Henry Kissinger, John McCain, John Cornyn, CEOs, the news media, the Catholic Church, other churches, educators, and many more.
Now, who are those vigorously standing up to save America?
Note: This site is monitored and government documents tend to disappear shortly after publication, depending on the nature of the topic. If you see documents that interest you, consider printing them for your files. Thanks for visiting.